Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Victoria's avatar

I've been thinking about van Velden, I do that quite a lot because she's my electorate MP. She's said at ACT conferences that Milton Friedman is her favourite economist. We know Atlas is one of many networks of think tanks coming from those Mont Pelerin Society economists: Hayek and Friedman being the best known. Having done some digging, I don't think this amendment is about the budget for ACT, is about using the budget to hide their goal of undermining worker rights. As with Reagan and Thatcher, who both had Friedman as their economic adviser, they understood step one to a free market and neoliberalism, was undermine worker rights. Step 2 undermine education so you have an illiterate/ drone workforce. Van Velden told us who she was at that ACT conference. She is mini Thatcher. With that comes massive business closures, doubling of unemployment, massive erosion of worker rights and transfer of wealth to the already wealthy. Don't be fooled by thinking this was about a single annual budget, that was the smokescreen and a way to blame National and Willis.

Expand full comment
Keith Marshall's avatar

I would like a woman opposition MP to put in the ballot box a private member's bill that would introduce legislation mandating that female government ministers and parliamentary undersecretaries' salaries be reduced to 92c in the $1 paid to male government ministers and parliamentary undersecretaries.

Would the clown car coalition government support that?

Expand full comment
98 more comments...

No posts